06-10-2008, 11:47 PM
[center]M4Maniac's KJW M92 Vertec Review (Side review of G&P Stubby Mock Silencer)
![[Image: DSCN0924.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0924.jpg)
1. First Impressions/Appearance/Feel
2. Real-Steel History
3. Build Quality
4. Performance (Accuracy, Power and Gas Efficiency)
5. KJW's M92 Vertec SPECIFICS/SPECIALTIES
6. Ordering
7. Pro's and Con's
8. G&P Stubby Silencer mini-review
[/center]
![[Image: DSCN0923.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0923.jpg)
1. First Impressions
When my family and I arrived home from Utah today, I was thrilled to see the brown box on the front steps. I ran out, grabbed it, sprinted back to my room, and immediately cut the box open. I mulled through it quickly, making sure everything I ordered was there.
![[Image: DSCN0928.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0928.jpg)
Upon opening the box with my pistol in it, I was greeted by a somewhat off-balance sight. To me, the M92 is a very off-balance looking pistol. Too much weight at the back, and because of the extended ejection port (almost all the way to the front sight) there is nothing up front. So, of course, first thing I did was grab the threaded barrel I had ordered and shoved it on there, following it with the suppressor I had ordered.
After cradling it, disassembling it, reassembling it, and giving it a very thorough cleaning, I had reached one and only one conclusion.
This gun was beautiful.
I have handled 9mm Berettas in real life, and this was was very close to the real thing. I can't say for sure, but holding it with the mag in felt about the same as an unloaded Beretta. I think it's a little lighter though.
Every time I racked the slide back, I was greeted with the gratifying sound of metal grinding on metal. I guess, I shouldn't say grinding per se. I'm sure you know what I'm talking about, though. After checking the gun very thoroughly, I have decided it really does live up to it's claim of being full-metal. The following parts, on the exterior at least, are metal:
Slide
Outer Barrel
Safety Switches (Ambidextrous Safety, more later)
Hammer
Grip Frame
Trigger
Magazine Catch/Release
Lanyard Ring (More later as well)
as well as the majority of the internal parts.
I give the First Impressions/Appearance/Feel a 9.5/10. The only problem I have is that when the silencer is attached, and the gun is pointed up, when I rack the slide it doesn't quite return to where it is supposed to be. It stays 1.5-2 mm behind where it is supposed to. However, this does not affect firing, and with a little 100% silicon lube on the rails it doesn't have the problem any more.
Anyway, on with the review!
2. Real-Steel History (Courtesy of Wikipedia)
3. Build Quality
As you've read above, the KJW M92 Vertec is full metal, or as close as it can be. The real question is this:
How good is the metal?
I have put every metal part I can find through scratch tests, and have yet to have a place scratch under my fingernail. I won't try with my knives, because I know they'll get through the paint (they will get through even the toughest KWA orange paint
) but the paint appears to be very solid. All the metal parts make a nice clink when I flick them, not the nasty thunk that pot metal makes. The rails the slide, well, slides on are unpainted, but that is unsurprising, obviously. They show very little wear, but my guess is that will change while I own this gun.
All in all, I give the build quality a 8/10, just because the metal feels TOO light. However, this gun is by and large the best pistol I've owned, at least this far into the review.
![[Image: DSCN0943.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0943.jpg)
Shall we continue? Or do you wish to leave before we hit the performance section?
4. Performance - Accuracy
I was just joking with you. This gun is, once again, the best gun I've ever used, or, in fact, seen (compared to the following: KWA G26C, KWC Desert Eagle, WE Dragon 5.1). Out of a stock pistol, at ranges of Five and Ten meters, the accuracy of the weapon is formidable at worst. At 50 feet and in, I really wouldn't want to be near someone with this weapon.
Here's the picture at 5 meters.
![[Image: DSCN0948.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0948.jpg)
That's 6 shots, in 2 groups less than an inch apart, each group being less than 3/4 of an inch in width. Whoever was there is D-E-A-D Dead.
Here's the picture at 10 meters. Not quite as pretty, but what can you expect?
![[Image: DSCN0947.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0947.jpg)
I tried to spend less time aiming and more time shooting, and look what it got me!
As much as I dislike this grouping, once again, at about 33 feet, whoever was there is D-E-A-D Dead.
And, last, but definitely not least, here's the practical grouping. This was fired in quick succession (1 shot per second) but WITH the suppressor attached, effectively blocking my sights. I had to guess where I was aimed.
![[Image: DSCN0949.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0949.jpg)
My sharpie died, so I couldn't circle the entry wounds, but you get the picture. Still not bad at all, still D-E-A-D Dead, and this time more quickly and quietly than before.
Power and Gas Efficiency
The power of this gun is quite formidable as well.
Using the poor man's chrono, I discovered the following:
The gun has enough power with .2's from 6" to penetrate both sides of the can and occasionally crack the bottom (deep dents mostly).
With the silencer on, there is no difference.
From 10', .2's penetrated one side of the can and left a nice dent on the opposite side.
This is a hard-shooting gun, and I DO NOT ADVISE using it under 10'. You can double-tap like nobody's business (my 5m grouping with the silencer is evidence enough) so two of those shots to the face, even if they have a balaclava on, is going to hurt like no other.
If you are going to use it inside 10', PLEASE, take body shots.
Gas efficiency is about 2 magazines worth per fill, or about 50 shots (assuming ideal temperature conditions). It does get steadily weaker after the first mag.
I have to give this gun a 10/10, for the simple fact that I was astounded at its accuracy.
![[Image: DSCN0924.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0924.jpg)
1. First Impressions/Appearance/Feel
2. Real-Steel History
3. Build Quality
4. Performance (Accuracy, Power and Gas Efficiency)
5. KJW's M92 Vertec SPECIFICS/SPECIALTIES
6. Ordering
7. Pro's and Con's
8. G&P Stubby Silencer mini-review
[/center]
![[Image: DSCN0923.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0923.jpg)
1. First Impressions
When my family and I arrived home from Utah today, I was thrilled to see the brown box on the front steps. I ran out, grabbed it, sprinted back to my room, and immediately cut the box open. I mulled through it quickly, making sure everything I ordered was there.
![[Image: DSCN0928.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0928.jpg)
Upon opening the box with my pistol in it, I was greeted by a somewhat off-balance sight. To me, the M92 is a very off-balance looking pistol. Too much weight at the back, and because of the extended ejection port (almost all the way to the front sight) there is nothing up front. So, of course, first thing I did was grab the threaded barrel I had ordered and shoved it on there, following it with the suppressor I had ordered.
After cradling it, disassembling it, reassembling it, and giving it a very thorough cleaning, I had reached one and only one conclusion.
This gun was beautiful.
I have handled 9mm Berettas in real life, and this was was very close to the real thing. I can't say for sure, but holding it with the mag in felt about the same as an unloaded Beretta. I think it's a little lighter though.
Every time I racked the slide back, I was greeted with the gratifying sound of metal grinding on metal. I guess, I shouldn't say grinding per se. I'm sure you know what I'm talking about, though. After checking the gun very thoroughly, I have decided it really does live up to it's claim of being full-metal. The following parts, on the exterior at least, are metal:
Slide
Outer Barrel
Safety Switches (Ambidextrous Safety, more later)
Hammer
Grip Frame
Trigger
Magazine Catch/Release
Lanyard Ring (More later as well)
as well as the majority of the internal parts.
I give the First Impressions/Appearance/Feel a 9.5/10. The only problem I have is that when the silencer is attached, and the gun is pointed up, when I rack the slide it doesn't quite return to where it is supposed to be. It stays 1.5-2 mm behind where it is supposed to. However, this does not affect firing, and with a little 100% silicon lube on the rails it doesn't have the problem any more.
Anyway, on with the review!
2. Real-Steel History (Courtesy of Wikipedia)
Wikipedia (thanks!) Wrote:
The Beretta 92 pistol evolved from earlier Beretta designs, most notably the M1922 and M1951. From the M922 comes the open slide design, while the alloy frame and locking block barrel (originally from Walther P38) were first used in the M1951. The grip angle and the front sight integrated with the slide were also common to earlier Beretta pistols.
The Beretta 92 first appeared in 1976 and was designed by Carlo Beretta, Giuseppe Mazzetti and Vittorio Valle, all experienced firearms designers on the Beretta design team.
3. Build Quality
As you've read above, the KJW M92 Vertec is full metal, or as close as it can be. The real question is this:
How good is the metal?
I have put every metal part I can find through scratch tests, and have yet to have a place scratch under my fingernail. I won't try with my knives, because I know they'll get through the paint (they will get through even the toughest KWA orange paint
) but the paint appears to be very solid. All the metal parts make a nice clink when I flick them, not the nasty thunk that pot metal makes. The rails the slide, well, slides on are unpainted, but that is unsurprising, obviously. They show very little wear, but my guess is that will change while I own this gun.All in all, I give the build quality a 8/10, just because the metal feels TOO light. However, this gun is by and large the best pistol I've owned, at least this far into the review.
![[Image: DSCN0943.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0943.jpg)
Shall we continue? Or do you wish to leave before we hit the performance section?
4. Performance - Accuracy
I was just joking with you. This gun is, once again, the best gun I've ever used, or, in fact, seen (compared to the following: KWA G26C, KWC Desert Eagle, WE Dragon 5.1). Out of a stock pistol, at ranges of Five and Ten meters, the accuracy of the weapon is formidable at worst. At 50 feet and in, I really wouldn't want to be near someone with this weapon.
Here's the picture at 5 meters.
![[Image: DSCN0948.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0948.jpg)
That's 6 shots, in 2 groups less than an inch apart, each group being less than 3/4 of an inch in width. Whoever was there is D-E-A-D Dead.
Here's the picture at 10 meters. Not quite as pretty, but what can you expect?
![[Image: DSCN0947.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0947.jpg)
I tried to spend less time aiming and more time shooting, and look what it got me!

As much as I dislike this grouping, once again, at about 33 feet, whoever was there is D-E-A-D Dead.
And, last, but definitely not least, here's the practical grouping. This was fired in quick succession (1 shot per second) but WITH the suppressor attached, effectively blocking my sights. I had to guess where I was aimed.
![[Image: DSCN0949.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0949.jpg)
My sharpie died, so I couldn't circle the entry wounds, but you get the picture. Still not bad at all, still D-E-A-D Dead, and this time more quickly and quietly than before.
Power and Gas Efficiency
The power of this gun is quite formidable as well.
Using the poor man's chrono, I discovered the following:
The gun has enough power with .2's from 6" to penetrate both sides of the can and occasionally crack the bottom (deep dents mostly).
With the silencer on, there is no difference.
From 10', .2's penetrated one side of the can and left a nice dent on the opposite side.
This is a hard-shooting gun, and I DO NOT ADVISE using it under 10'. You can double-tap like nobody's business (my 5m grouping with the silencer is evidence enough) so two of those shots to the face, even if they have a balaclava on, is going to hurt like no other.
If you are going to use it inside 10', PLEASE, take body shots.
Gas efficiency is about 2 magazines worth per fill, or about 50 shots (assuming ideal temperature conditions). It does get steadily weaker after the first mag.
I have to give this gun a 10/10, for the simple fact that I was astounded at its accuracy.
![[Image: Beretta92FS.jpg]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c8/Beretta92FS.jpg)
![[Image: DSCN0933.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0933.jpg)
![[Image: DSCN0936.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0936.jpg)
![[Image: DSCN0942.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0942.jpg)
![[Image: DSCN0941.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0941.jpg)
![[Image: DSCN0945.jpg]](http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b355/Sarge541/DSCN0945.jpg)