Both of which can be found cheaper on E#aybanned for roughly the same quality if not better. Might have to dig through some reviews, but it'll give you some idea.
You almost always get what you pay for.
(08-19-2010 02:04 PM)GeistACWM Wrote: [ -> ]Both of which can be found cheaper on E#aybanned for roughly the same quality if not better. Might have to dig through some reviews, but it'll give you some idea.
You almost always get what you pay for.
Ya. Checked there. But the thing is I just need an optic that holds the zero on a platform that recoils slightly. I mean these optics can't be too terrible right?
No. But neither can their cheaper e%aybanned counterpart. There are numerous reviews of those.
Every basic aimpoint knock I purchased from E%aybanned has been good. Every magnifier has been garbage.
I use a replica ACOG on my RS rifle with no complaints.
Cant really provide any feedback but from what I understand, they all come from a one or two manufacturer then it passes through a "little bit" of quality control. The expensive ones that you see from retailers are said to have better quality.
(08-19-2010 05:16 PM)GeistACWM Wrote: [ -> ]No. But neither can their cheaper e%aybanned counterpart. There are numerous reviews of those.
Every basic aimpoint knock I purchased from E%aybanned has been good. Every magnifier has been garbage.
I use a replica ACOG on my RS rifle with no complaints.
Ok. So generally speaking I can assume that the knockoff ACOG and EoTechs wont be a piece of trash out of the box?
I can only speak for the ones I've bought. Which I'll track down for ya another time
Have the exact same ACOG with the trades and the red dot.
On a GBBR I've noticed after hard use, the glue holding the lens inside or what not begins to flake all over the scope. If you don't mind a dirty scope seeing black dots here and there then by all means buy it cause the externals are pretty spiffy.
With the tritium tube, don't expect much. It looks like shit stain compared to the RS version.